Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Glowing night | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than the vivo NEX 3, having a 90.7 score against 73.9. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a newer and thinner cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but it is just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to vivo NEX 3's one, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots clearer photographs and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, a much worse 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.