Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 6 is a little bit better than vivo NEX 3, getting a overall score of 76.5 against 73.9. Although the Xiaomi Mi 6 is extremely older than vivo NEX 3, it's body is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 6 features a little more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixels count per inch of screen. The vivo NEX 3 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 34% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.