Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Glowing night | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a general score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Mi A3 is a thinner and much lighter phone than vivo NEX 3, even though both of them were released only 2 months apart.
Vivo NEX 3 features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a greater pixel quantity per screen inch, a bit bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2256 pixels.
The vivo NEX 3 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The vivo NEX 3 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also has a lot more MP back camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.