Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than vivo NEX 3, getting an 83.8 score against 73.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the vivo NEX 3, despite of the fact that it was released around 18 months before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features as much memory for games and applications as the vivo NEX 3 one, both have the same internal memory. Vivo NEX 3 features longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.