Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than vivo NEX 3's score of 73.9. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older than vivo NEX 3, it's construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a slightly better screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. Vivo NEX 3 shoots better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as vivo NEX 3's one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo NEX 3 features a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.