Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than vivo NEX 3, having an 84.3 score against 73.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has older 14 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 body is much newer and noticeably thinner, but just a little bit heavier than vivo NEX 3.
Vivo NEX 3 features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot better display than vivo NEX 3, because it has a bigger screen, a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a way better 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos, a bigger aperture for better low light images and video and a much higher video resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 both have very similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little longer battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.