Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a general score of 83.7, which is better than vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has the previous 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 and vivo NEX 3 were released with only 2 months difference, Xiaomi Mi Note 10's body is a little thicker but just a bit lighter.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a slightly better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The vivo NEX 3 has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features improved battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a little bit better camera than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.