Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glowing night | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than the vivo NEX 3's score of 73.9. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's body is just a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than vivo NEX 3, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo NEX 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way better video definition.
Vivo NEX 3 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.