Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Glowing night | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a general score of 78.7, which is a bit better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 overall score. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than vivo NEX 3. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has the previous 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and vivo NEX 3 count with quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little greater pixel number per screen inch.
Vivo NEX 3 has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo NEX 3 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also has a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.