Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Glowing night | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC body has the same thickness than vivo NEX 3, but it is just a little bit lighter.
The vivo NEX 3 has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels count per display inch and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Vivo NEX 3 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit superior battery duration than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Vivo NEX 3 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature really similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and video in low light situations, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution, a back facing camera with a 64 mega pixels and a 0.59 inches back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.