Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glowing night | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a score of 82.4, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an older 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo NEX 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little greater pixel density.
Vivo NEX 3 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's camera is very similar to the vivo NEX 3 one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit better battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.