Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Glowing night | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3, with an 81.1 score against 73.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though both were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a display that's just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display. Vivo NEX 3 has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and vivo NEX 3 count with quite similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same resolution camera, the same camera sensor size and the same video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.