Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glowing night | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is better than vivo NEX 3, having a overall score of 83 against 73.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's body is newer, just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has the previous 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a slightly better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Vivo NEX 3 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
Vivo NEX 3 has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a little better battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.