Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 77.8. The iPhone 11 is an extremely older and notably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple managed to build it lighter anyway. IPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 OS.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than iPhone 11, because it has a better screen pixel density, a way bigger display, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and much more brightness. IPhone 11 has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 11, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 11, because it has an 83 percent greater battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.