Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Even being the best phone we compare here, the iPhone 11 Pro Max is a older, just a little heavier and incredibly thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. IPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 12 GB less RAM and 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better display than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger display and a much brighter display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a way bigger camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot higher video quality and a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.