Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 has a score of 88.7, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Although iPhone 12 is a lot older and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a lot lighter. The iPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter display than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a lot larger screen, a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a really brighter display.
The iPhone 12 features a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and 12 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a way more megapixels camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone 12, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Apple iPhone 12 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.