Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 14.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 mini has a score of 88.5, which is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. IPhone 12 mini has iOS 14.x OS, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 OS. The iPhone 12 mini construction is incredibly lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is thicker and was released many years before.
The iPhone 12 mini has a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 12 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480, much more brightness and a lot larger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2227mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
The iPhone 12 mini is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.