Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 92.8 score against 77.8. IPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 operating system. IPhone 12 Pro is a notably older and a lot thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple made it lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a sharper display than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a much bigger screen, a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a way brighter screen. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 102 percent more battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way higher video definition.
The iPhone 12 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.