Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 93.2 score against 77.8. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS. Although it's the best in this review, it must be told that it is also notably older, incredibly thicker and a little bit heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking display than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a larger screen, a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way brighter display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 10 GB lesser RAM and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 55 percent greater battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with way more MP.
IPhone 12 Pro Max is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.