Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 has a score of 91.5, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. IPhone 13 has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 OS. The iPhone 13 is a much older and extremely thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple managed to build it much lighter anyway.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and 12 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has a quite lower display pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger display, a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and much more display brightness.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than iPhone 13, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 13, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.