Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 operating system. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, we must note that it's also an extremely older, a lot thicker and just a little heavier phone.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better display than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.