Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 16.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro construction is a little lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's a lot thicker and was released just 19 months before. Apple iPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 operating system.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a much bigger display, a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and much more brightness. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser cores (although faster) and 10 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better camera than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a camera with more MP and a lot better video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Apple iPhone 14 Pro is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.