Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 16.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max has a global score of 94.9, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. The iPhone 14 Pro Max design is older, way thicker and just a bit heavier than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. IPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better display than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low-light situations, a much better video resolution and a back-facing camera with a better resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.