Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 9.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s Plus has a general score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Although iPhone 6s Plus is notably older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. The iPhone 6s Plus works with iOS 9.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 OS.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a much brighter display, a much larger screen, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen. The Apple iPhone 6s Plus features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less processing cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics co-processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 107% more battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher video definition.
The iPhone 6s Plus not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.