Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 7 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Although the Apple iPhone 7 is incredibly older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still extremely lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than iPhone 7, because it has much more brightness, a lot larger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a better screen density.
The iPhone 7 counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and 14 GB less RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 7, because it has more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than iPhone 7, because it has a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video, a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a lot better video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 7, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone 7 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.