Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2020) is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 81.5 score against 77.8. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 operating system. Apple iPhone SE (2020)'s body is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released 4 years before.
IPhone SE (2020) counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 13 GB lesser RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has way more brightness, a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a lot bigger screen and a higher screen pixel density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a way higher video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the iPhone SE (2020) is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.