Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 77.8. IPhone X is a older and noticeably thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple managed to make it a lot lighter anyway. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot bigger screen, a way brighter screen and a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The Apple iPhone X features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than iPhone X, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 110 percent more battery size.
Apple iPhone X is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.