Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Even though iPhone XR is extremely older and notably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter. Apple iPhone XR counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than iPhone XR, because it has a much larger screen, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a better pixels density and a way brighter screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
The iPhone XR is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.