Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. The iPhone XS is a much older and way thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple was able to make it lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better screen than iPhone XS, because although it has a bit worse display density, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a way larger display and a really brighter screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage. IPhone XS features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 12 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than iPhone XS, because it has a way larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos.
IPhone XS not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.