Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 86.3 score against 77.8. The Asus ROG Phone 3 is a better phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, we must tell that it's also a noticeably older, much thicker and a bit heavier phone. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper screen than Asus ROG Phone 3, because it has a little bit better display pixels density, way more brightness, a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a larger display.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Asus ROG Phone 3 has just a little bit longer battery duration than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a camera that is just as good as vivo X Fold 3 Pro's camera, because although the Asus ROG Phone 3 has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low light situations and a way smaller back camera sensor offering a way lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, it also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.