Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 94 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-06-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.80 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.40 ounces |
| Black and White | Matte White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 18 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate is a lot better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 94 against 77.8. Even being the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also a incredibly older, incredibly thicker and just a bit heavier device. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a sharper display than Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate, because it has way more brightness, a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a larger display and a quite better display pixel density.
The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate's memory for apps and games is just as good as the vivo X Fold 3 Pro one, both have the same 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate's camera is just as good as the camera in vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although the Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate has a lot smaller sensor shooting much lower quality videos and photos and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate features a bit superior battery lifetime than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.