Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-07-12 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.62 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, having a overall score of 77.8 against 77.5. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is noticeably heavier than the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, it's noticeably thinner and newer. Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe has a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking display than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a much bigger display and a little bit greater display pixels density. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery duration than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.