Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.50 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Pastel white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 88.3 against 77.8. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro construction is a lot older, just a bit heavier and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Asus ZenFone 7 Pro, because it has a way brighter display, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Asus ZenFone 7 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 7 Pro, because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.