Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Google Pixel is a incredibly older and notably thicker device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Google made it incredibly lighter anyway. The Google Pixel features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 less CPU cores (although faster) and less RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel, because it has a lot better 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a much higher video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.