Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Google Pixel 2 XL is an extremely older and noticeably thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Google managed to make it notably lighter anyway. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 62 percent greater battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a back-facing camera with way more MP, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.