Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a score of 80 against 77.8. Although the Google Pixel 3 is much older and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still incredibly lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a really larger display and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 96% larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.