Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Google Pixel 3a XL is a much older and notably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Google managed to build it extremely lighter anyway.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a lot bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a just a bit better display density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a much better video definition, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 54% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.