Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Although Google Pixel 4 is incredibly older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still much lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a lot larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher video resolution and a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 104% greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.