Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 global score. These phones have Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version, counting with a lot of extra features. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is newer and thinner, but heavier than the Google Pixel 6a.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, because it has more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery life than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 6a. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 6a, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.