Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 414 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 92.1 score against 77.8. Both phones in this review use the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also just a bit heavier and way thicker.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 2800 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more display brightness and a just a bit better pixels quantity per display inch.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 1 TB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 5600mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have a 50 mega-pixels camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.