Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 414 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 92.1 score against 77.8. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is an a bit heavier and a lot thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. These phones come with the same Android 14 operating system. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1280 x 2800, it also counts with a bit brighter screen and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 512 GB more internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has more RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or videos in low light situations, and they both have a 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a way better video definition and a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.