Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 414 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is notably newer and much thinner, but way heavier than HTC U11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
HTC U11 counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger sensor and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get HTC U11, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.