Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than HTC U11 EYEs's general score of 76.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 operating system, and HTC U11 EYEs has Android, HTC Sense UI operating system. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is notably newer and thinner, but also heavier than the HTC U11 EYEs.
HTC U11 EYEs features a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a little higher screen density and a way bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 45 percent greater battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.