Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.07 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.03 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design has an overall score of 80.1, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design has the newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design is an a lot older and way thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Huawei managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because it has a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of screen, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot bigger screen. Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design counts with a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage for games and applications than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.