Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-11-17 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.07 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Brown, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 10 Pro is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 79.2 against 77.8. The Huawei Mate 10 Pro is a way older and notably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Huawei made it somewhat lighter anyway. The Huawei Mate 10 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a really larger screen and a little more pixels per screen inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a camera with a lot higher resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.