Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Emerald green and Twilight |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 20 Pro is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 77.8. Even though Huawei Mate 20 Pro is noticeably older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter. The Huawei Mate 20 Pro features a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper display than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture for better low light photography and video.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Huawei Mate 20 Pro is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.