Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 95.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.88 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Leather |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1176 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (7680 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design has an overall score of 95.8, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design's body is a little lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's incredibly thicker and was released many years before.
The Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better display than Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design, because it has a little greater pixels density, a better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design's storage for apps and games is just as good as the vivo X Fold 3 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery duration than Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Huawei Mate 30 RS Porsche Design, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.