Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.07 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Crush blue and Midsummer purple |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 430.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3750mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei nova 5T has an overall score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Huawei nova 5T has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Huawei nova 5T is a notably older and incredibly thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Huawei was able to make it way lighter anyway.
Huawei nova 5T features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Huawei nova 5T, because it has a quite higher pixel density, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than Huawei nova 5T, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera in the back with a higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Huawei nova 5T, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery performance than Huawei nova 5T, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Huawei nova 5T is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.