Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the LG G5's 76.1 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is extremely newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than the LG G5.
The LG G5 features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cores (although faster). The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than LG G5, because although it has a lot lower pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a really larger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than LG G5, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with way more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a much larger sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than LG G5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G5. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG G5, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.