Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a 77.8 score against 77. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a lot heavier than the LG G7 Fit, it's notably thinner and notably newer. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG G7 Fit has a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster). The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a way worse pixels amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a way larger display and a way brighter screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger aperture and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.